|
Post by IrekeOnibudo on Feb 3, 2016 19:22:00 GMT
IrekeOnibudo I am curious...you believe all these sources you posted? I thought I had already answered that question. Look closely enough and you would find that even first class Obas talk about different waves of migration. Mainly because the didactic view is often unsettled by such notions, this is where I feel the need for further research comes in. History is not as sterile as we often make out. And what is more; accepting that the crystalisation of 'identity' is a process, does not make it any less authentic.
|
|
|
Post by IrekeOnibudo on Feb 3, 2016 19:25:55 GMT
Egbon irekeonibudo, ewo tun ni awon screen shots ti e post yen? Please don't say you actually believe in those? Ogagun Crip, I am simply trying to illustrate some of the many schools of thought which exist. Please see my last post.
|
|
|
Post by colonial pikin on Feb 3, 2016 19:26:11 GMT
IrekeOnibudo I am curious...you believe all these sources you posted? I thought I had already answered that question. Look closely enough and you would find that even first class Obas talk about different waves of migration. Mainly because the didactic view is often unsettled by such notions, this is where I feel the need for further research comes in. History is not as sterile as we often make out. And what is more; accepting that the crystalisation of 'identity' is a process, does not make it any less authentic. oh okay sorry....
|
|
|
Post by IrekeOnibudo on Feb 3, 2016 19:29:36 GMT
I thought I had already answered that question. Look closely enough and you would find that even first class Obas talk about different waves of migration. Mainly because the didactic view is often unsettled by such notions, this is where I feel the need for further research comes in. History is not as sterile as we often make out. And what is more; accepting that the crystalisation of 'identity' is a process, does not make it any less authentic. oh okay sorry.... No worries at all
|
|
|
Post by Omo Oba of the Source on Feb 3, 2016 19:48:13 GMT
Egbon irekeonibudo, ewo tun ni awon screen shots ti e post yen? Please don't say you actually believe in those? Ogagun Crip, I am simply trying to illustrate some of the many schools of thought which exist. Please see my last post. Oh oda. Quite interesting, the schools of thought that is.
|
|
|
Post by Shymmex on Feb 5, 2016 1:09:38 GMT
Interesting angle.
There's no problem in checking different hypothesis...though I still believe that Yorubas came to present day Nigeria via different migration waves, from somewhere around the Nile Valley axis. Once you look at the timeline of the different migration waves, further into Africa, that happened in the Nile valley axis and correspond that with timeline of the carbon testing of most of the Yoruba artefacts from Ife - you'd see a pattern. Then the Oranmiyan obelisk is another one.
We all know that before the arrival of Yorubas and other west African groups with Haplogroup E-V38 - only the Bantus occupied present day Nigeria. And Yorubas aren't Bantus. So where did Yorubas come from?
We also need to be careful about how we define "Hebrew" in today's terms. Today's Israel has no correlation whatsoever with ancient Hebrews. Today's Israelis are European converts and they're mostly Ashkenazi Jews. And where Israel is located today used to be part of Africa - black land. So everything should be done in context of ancient Hebrews before discarding the research no matter how ridiculous it may sound.
A few questions:
1). If ancient Hebrews are different from today's Jews and they were believed to be black - where did they disappear to?
2). Where are all the black folks who migrated further into Africa during ancient times, from the present day North Africa and Middle East, due to different invasions by other races of people and wars?
|
|
|
Post by Her Highness on Feb 5, 2016 1:18:01 GMT
Teacher don come... *make I carry my chair siddon for here*
|
|
|
Post by olukumi on Feb 16, 2016 11:59:04 GMT
|
|